Book Me For A Speech

My Writing and Ranting

Press Room

Good Books

« Tried and Attested: Rob Briner on Evidence-Based Management | Main | NASCAR Fun: Kick-off for an Executive Program on Customer-Focused Innovation »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jon Pincus

Interesting research indeed, and a great resource in the BPS abstracts; thanks doubly for the link. I've certainly seen this kind of effect in myself (my blog post on this is titled "so it's not just me" :-)) and anecdotally in others; nice to have some solid data to back it up.

I agree very much with Lauren's point about how the "misogynistic" characterization detracts from the overall point. Whether or not the behaviors are classically misogynistic, or just a general tolerance for uncivil behavior which is intensified along existing power vectors (and thus in most organizations will fall more intensely on women), the result's the same. And my guess is that it we'd see similar dynamics along other dimensions of diversity; as you point out, this is consistent with findings related to bullying, and while of course there are some significant differences (for example, white males being noticeably less likely to have observed bullying than others) the overall pattern is that abuse takes a toll on witnesses as well as participants.

And unsurprisingly I also agree with Lauren (and your book) that a general culture of respect is the best antidote to this.

jon

Lavinia Weissman

This is a great piece of research and at the same time while I support the idea and study, I believe that the traditional definition of mysogyny robs the study of its power.

The traditional definition asserts that mysogyny is a behavior exercised by men who hate women.

In the workplace, I believe there is an undercurrent that ties more strategically to your "no arsehole rule," that robs the value of civil dialogue and inquiry that has become essential to learning to know to do and innovate.

What is described as mysogynist behavior as referenced in your entry and the research, I believe is more about the need any one person (man or woman) to be the "top gun", "the leader of the pack" or exercise control of the hero or heroine.

The 21st century of work anywhere is complex and productivity is growing in places where there is a blend of civil behavior that invites respect for expertise and respect for contribution and cooperation.

Most of the failures that I can identify in what we often describe as a "male dominated organization," have to do with lack of respect for the significant contributions based on expertise and learning that are key to assuring a culture of innovation.

Happy Thanksgiving and thank you for elevating the conversation of culture, change and work as an examination of behavior and opportunity to support the practice and behavior of wise organizations of people.

Dawn Baird

Fortunately, it is being less and less tolerated in modern, forward-thinking companies in Northern Ireland.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Scaling up Excellence

Good Boss Bad Boss

No Asshole Rule

Hard Facts

Weird Ideas

Knowing -Doing Gap

http://bobsutton.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451b75569e20168e878040d970c-pi

The No Asshole Rule:Articles and Stories