My
latest post on The Working Life at
Harvard Business Online just came-out. It is called The
War for Talent is Back and starts out:
"Last
week I did a workshop with a group of about 20 CIOs from large companies. Our
discussion focused on what they could do to build a more civilized workplace.
In the course of our conversation, each of these executives emphasized--as I have
read recently in The Economist,
The New York Times,
and BusinessWeek--that
building a workplace that attracts and keeps great people is especially
important now because the job market for skilled people is so hot. I also have
heard similar messages at other companies I have visited recently, including
eBay, Microsoft, Google, SuccessFactors, and Yahoo!, as well as from managers
at companies including Procter & Gamble and Fidelity Investments."
I develop five suggestions for winning the so-called war for talent
in some detail (see the
post for my arguments); note the first four clash with advice
given by many so-called experts, but are supported by much peer-reviewed research.
1. Superstars are
overrated.
2. Great systems are more
important than great people.
3. Create smaller rather
than larger pay differences between "star" employees and everyone else.
4. The law of crappy people
is probably a myth.
5. The no asshole rule helps.
P.S. Also see The Waste of Talent.
Bob,
The "smaller rather than larger pay differences" are pretty closely followed among the clients with whom I work.
The organizations get into difficulty when they start squeezing more out of employees for a meager pay raise--and then the annual report shows the gap between the CEO/Executive Team and the others. And, the executive increases make the issue an even more emotional one.
Posted by: steveroesler | April 24, 2007 at 10:49 AM
The ideas contained in War for Talent are pernicious for the reasons you've outlined. Let me add two more.
Success is rooted in the team, not the superstar. Even Michael Jordan couldn't bring a championship to Chicago by himself.
The keys to individual team success are systems and the team's supervisor. The systems are a corporate feature, but even in lousy corporations, there are great supervisors leading teams with high productivity and high morale.
Posted by: Wally Bock | April 24, 2007 at 10:07 AM
Bob:
I think there are great people who don't come with a superstar complex. We keep forgetting about all the other people who may or may not get to do great work in companies.
It's about the people *and* the opportunities that the systems companies put in place afford them. I could give you most of my career as an example. And I can tell you I succeeded largely despite the fact that most systems resisted what was possible.
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | April 23, 2007 at 06:04 PM