This morning's Sunday New York Times has a well-researched piece by Phyllis Korkki in her Career Couch column called "I Find You Annoying, But I Can Cope." It starts out with a quote from Jonathan Littman about the implications of the ideas in I Hate People for dealing people who bug you at work (see their post), and travels through a lot different methods for coping with the problem from several other researchers and the like. I was quoted in the article several times, emphasizing some of my favorite themes from The No Asshole Rule including the virtues of learning indifference and emotional detachment to deal with people who bug you, especially when you can't make an immediate escape -- to not let them touch your soul as I say so often.
Alas, very early in my conversations with Phyllis she informed that, as had happened with The New York Times from the outset, they wouldn't publish the name of my book, even though it is a bestseller, the ideas are used in many companies, it was on their bestseller list (albeit as The No ******* Rule), and they accepted a lot of money from my publisher to print large ads that mocked them for not printing the title. In fact, they weren't even willing to indicate that I was an author of a book on the subject in the article. I find the whole thing silly but made clear to Phyllis that I understood Times policy and we should go ahead with the interviews, and I think she did a great job of capturing all sorts of ways of coping with challenge of working with people who drive you crazy. This censorship thing comes with the territory, and as I wrote here and here at Huffington awhile back, is something I've tried to have fun with -- but I remain amazed by who is offended and who is not by the title -- it was fine for a bible studies class, the Wall Street Journal, and Fortune, but not for The New York Times!
I also wanted to dig into my comment in the article about the virtues of using headphones when you are in a loud office environment that makes it hard to concentrate (The above drawing takes this to its logical conclusion, because as I mentioned to her and Jonathan did too, I described how conflicts sometimes erupt in workplaces because other eat food that smells bad to their colleagues). When I talked to Phyllis, I mentioned that a good pair of noise-canceling headphones had prov en essential to my son for shutting-out his loud college roommate last year. In addition, it reminded me of 1995 study (here is the reference and abstract)by Greg Oldham and his colleagues, an experiment conducted in an organization, where they gave a random sample of employees the opportunity to listen to headphones while they worked (people who held diverse jobs in retail organization) and then tracked their tracked their reactions for four weeks, and compared them to people in a control condition who weren't offered the chance to use headphones. They found employees who used headphones "exhibited significant improvements in performance, turnover intentions, organization satisfaction, mood states, and other responses." They also found that people in the most boring and simple jobs had the most positive reactions to wearing the headphones... so there is some decent, if not definitive, evidence to support the use of headphones.
I'd like to add to the comment that the yellow ear protectors were a flag that someone was concentrating on their work. In my noisy office at work, I keep my headphones on most of the time, regardless of whether I have music playing or not. It minimizes interruptions since people assume you are concentrating. Also, you can choose to ignore people if they call out to you, and only after the second or third time say, "What?" as if you didn't hear them. This is a passive way of telling them that you don't want to be bothered with their nonsense unless it is absolutely necessary. This may not be "nice" but it works. And helps with my work productivity.
Regarding music affecting calculations/complicated technical work, I keep both rock and classical music on my iPod at work. If I need to tone the music down to do calculations, I find the classical music sometimes actually helps me--it's still good "white noise" to block out distractions but doesn't distract so much from thinking in itself. Honestly, I think the iPod is one of best inventions to help with workplace productivity ever.
Posted by: Patricia | June 25, 2009 at 07:27 AM
Does the benefit of headphones hold for more complex jobs where cooperation and collaboration are important? Have there been any studies for that population? I'd be interested in hearing about that.
Posted by: Doug Park | June 23, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Hi Bob,
I'm so sorry that this happened to you again. I'd rather have a book with a super-marketable title that people want to buy than a book with a title that traditional newspapers want to print but no one else cares about.
Anyhow, I've worked with Phyllis and she's terrific. This piece is no exception. Thanks for making the effort to ensure that these important messages are heard again and again.
Best,
Alexandra Levit
Workplace Author and Speaker
http://www.alexandralevit.com
Posted by: Alexandra Levit | June 23, 2009 at 05:51 PM
I've always found that headphones were a positive addition to the tools I use at work. However, this post made me think about a study mentioned in chapter 12 of Tom DeMarco and Timothy Lister's book Peopleware. They mentioned that music showed to have a negative affect on knowledge workers trying to figure out a somewhat complex problem. Although that particular case study wasn't documented, I think it has some truth. I think the statement "people in the most boring and simple jobs had the most positive reactions to wearing the headphones... " is key. I do have to "toggle" the use of my headphones for different situations, but I would never give them up!
Posted by: Jon | June 22, 2009 at 03:47 PM
When I was at HP in the 80's and 90's, lab stock carried big yellow ear protectors. They were popular with programmers, both to shut out sound and as a flag that they were in the middle of some concentrated work.
I also remember Capers Jones describing an invention of his, cubicle walls that went all the way to the ceiling with an extra partition that was hinged to close off the space. Never caught on.
Posted by: Walter Underwood | June 22, 2009 at 11:54 AM