I just got off the phone with executives from an unnamed large company who are thinking about implementing a "no jerk rule." I am, of course, a big fan of this idea. And there are organizations that have such rules and the implement them effectively, such as Baird, the financial services firm.
But I think they were a bit taken aback by how vehement I was about the dangers of just plastering the words everywhere, and not following it with the real work of implementing The No Asshole Rule (and, of course, this applies to any other norm in the organization... we wrote a lot about this in The Knowing-Doing Gap). I wanted to know if the reward and prestige systems already supported the rule, and if not, how they were going to change things. I wanted to know if the senior executives already modeled the right behavior, and if not, was something being done to make sure they changed their behavior. I wanted to know if there were known assholes in visible positions, and if there were, was something going to be done to change their behavior or send them packing --to signal that the words were not hollow.
As with all norms, the espoused beliefs don't mean much unless they are backed by what people do -- especially during the little moments. Google is an interesting case in point. Although they are imperfect like every human organization, it remains a civilized place because, as one senior executive explained to me years ago, "it isn't efficient to be an asshole here." That is a sign to me that the norm is working, and all the strategy and product stuff aside, it is impressive they seem to have sustained this norm despite their size and the relentless performance pressures.
To return to the dangers of hollow rhetoric: It is especially destructive when it comes to the no jerk or or no asshole rule. When organizations say it, but don't do it, when it does not constrain and describe how people act -- and no serious efforts are being made to begin implementing the norm -- the result is that double-whammy: Leaders are seen as both assholes and hypocrites.
I think the rule can be difficult to enforce in smaller companies where people who helped build the company have consolidated a powerful position. There are a few tips that you can implement to all team members, however, to tame their egos. We recently wrote about this http://academy.justjobs.com/tame-your-ego/ to help people be better team players. - Erich
Posted by: Erich Lagasse | January 19, 2012 at 08:26 AM
I'm just wondering who "polices" the rule if a company adopts it. I mean what if the asshole(s) get the job of deciding who's an asshole? or, what if the boss is an asshole but understands enough about human nature - is enough of a narcissist - to adopt the rule so he looks good but then applies it selectively?
Posted by: Jen | October 23, 2011 at 06:14 AM
Amen to your last sentence!
Posted by: Katy | October 11, 2011 at 11:29 AM
I've just end reading your book (French translation). It was funny to read chapter 6 three days after Steve Jobs' death. Here in Canada, his reputation is not as well-known than in California. It's almost illogical that Apple became that behemoth company with such a jerk at its command, isn't it?
Posted by: Alain Castonguay | October 10, 2011 at 05:54 AM