Harvard Business Online launched a new website a few days ago that includes new content and a nice new look and feel. As part of this effort, they have recruited a bunch of us as "Discussion Leaders," or in plain language, bloggers. This gang includes Tom Davenport, Tammy Erickson, Eric McNulty, Larry Prusak, Michael Watkins, and Gillian Corkindale. I am part of the group too, and my postings appear under Bob Sutton -- The Working Life, which fits with the Work Matters theme of this blog well. I've got two posts up now to introduce readers to my perspective, one on What I Worry About and Why and the another on a theme I've talked about here before, but with some new twists, Why I Wrote The No Asshole Rule. My next few posts are on the new design and business classes that we have been teaching at the Stanford d.school, look especially for a future post with a video of an original song by Stanford graduate student Gustavo Bitdinger called "Back to Orbit," which is inspired by Gordon MacKenzie's classic book Orbiting the Giant Hairball.
Our editor and chief cat herder in this adventure is Jimmy Guterman, who has done a masterful job of balancing pressures for Harvard to do something bold but that still preserves the mighty Harvard Business School brand. There is already a lot of content up on these blogs, and more will be posted at regular intervals (as I understand it, each of us will put up a post at least once a week). Check out what is up, add some comments (which are moderated). This is a really big step for Harvard Online, so I encourage you to give them feedback (I certainly have not hesitated). At the same, time remember (as I have to remind myself) that they need to be a bit more careful with this site than a private blog. They face pressures to please a set of diverse and opinionated stakeholders (from Harvard Business School faculty, to their demanding readers, to Harvard Business School Publishing -- which uses the site to sell content) -- or at least not to alienate too many of them too deeply. In light of the pressures they face, I am impressed how "loose" they are being with the blogs. But I am gently pushing them to open things a bit more and you might "help" them with this as well. Our philosophy at the Stanford d.school is that everything is a prototype, and although this site is a damn big improvement over the old one, it can and will keep getting better, and they need input -- and yes, critical comments -- to make that happen.